Even as the dust had barely begun to settle over the exit polls last night, commentators and candidates alike suddenly started talking about unexpected outcomes as if their involvement during the last six weeks was somehow entirely unrelated to the process.
Despite the tinsel touches of a leader’s debate, it certainly wasn’t the most exciting of election campaigns and fell well short of being inspirational. As far as the economy was concerned, the options on offer from those parties who were actually in a position to deliver a new government, or help to form one, sounded like asking the condemned for their preferred choice of execution. There was plenty of talk about change but not much about hope.
Those in the press and broadcasting who campaigned hard for the UK to emulate the US presidential style of televised encounter and thus enhance the democratic process somehow managed to omit the telling fact that voter turnout is actually lower in parts of the States than over here. This is of course the same media who had been providing the voting public with details of how their MPs are all lying, cheating, venal bastards who put themselves up for hire in order to pay for maintaining their second and third homes – and implying that those who had not been caught out were simply cleverer.
The consensus yesterday was that this election would be different from all those which had preceded it. So far, notwithstanding the uncertainty of who can form a government, the main distinction is that it has been the most expensive on record both for the parties and their respective backers. Yet in Wales, as in other parts of the UK, the voters appear to have been unimpressed by costly attempts at opinion forming and remained stubbornly determined to follow their instincts.
Meanwhile, interested observers are looking to Peter Black’s blogsite for an explanation on the frankly dismal performance by Welsh Liberal Democrats and how the national party once again managed to come third in a two horse race.
Update: An honest assessment of Plaid's performance is provided here by John Dixon.
Update: An honest assessment of Plaid's performance is provided here by John Dixon.
7 Comments:
I am absolutely delighted at the Swansea West result. I cannot stand the Labour candidate but I think even less of the Lib Dem creep Peter May. WTF happened to Rene?
Just watched Peter Black tell BBC Wales that Lembo was the architect of his own downfall. So much for Lib Dem solidarity in Wales.
Kinzett threw it away months ago. I cannot see him staying in Swansea much longer.
The Lib Dems must be wondering what the hell they have to do to win Swansea West. Everything but the kitchen sink went into their campaigning. As far as I can see, the pro-tory vote held up and a proportion of the anti-tory vote switched from Plaid to Labour.
Matt, what do you want? At least I provided an honests assessment.
Yes Peter, you were pretty forthcoming about Lembit. But as a recognised spokesman for your party in Wales, when are you going to provide a Postmortem (rather than a Postscript) on the Lib Dems inability to make an electoral inroads across the the UK.
An interesting thread on the Beans website: http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/Plaid-attacks-debates-exclusion-failing-make-ground-election/article-2130411-detail/article.html
Note Dai of Abertawe telling Ivor to "ffwcian off dros y bont!" - 09-May-2010 12:20.
Post a Comment