As expected, the Lib Dem leader side-stepped the awkward issue and came up with something inane about any comment being 'premature' at this stage - which is more than a bit ironic since one of the serious case reviews involved has reportedly been available since 2007.A further query posed was whether he felt it was appropriate for the Swansea Safeguarding Childen Board, which will publish reports & recommendations arising out of the three deaths, to be chaired by the city's own director of social services. The reason for the question is because teh second job requires him to objectively put together an explanation for what is understood to be a catalogue of departmental failings. He also has to come to a conclusion over who was at fault and if there are now sufficient proven controls & enough trained staff in place to prevent a repetition of these tragedies. This potential conflict in roles was greeted by the same mumbled evasions from Holley - and not pursued by the show's ever-amenable host.
But the main unanswered question for many is just how much leading political post-holders (past and present) knew about these horrific cases and if they have been in any way party to shabby arrangements that have introduced delays in the publication of hugely critical reports until just a few days before Assembly inspectors are scheduled to give their feedback on improvements.
2 Comments:
Well done on publishing this story last week.
The Evening Post gave their usual tame version of the expected report in Saturdays paper.
This is one of the most serious issues that Swansea Council has been responsible for and it will require thorough and proper reporting .... it's just a shame that a local blogger has to do it and not the local press.
Don't be too hard on the local press - that's our job.
Post a Comment